Are technologies deterministic?

In Chapter 2 of Technology Matters, David Nye poses the question “Are technologies deterministic?” (Page 17) He first exploded this question by explaining how at first Japan refused to use guns, it worked for a while. “A society or a group that is able to act without outside interference can abolish a powerful technology.” (Page 18) He than goes onto explore whether technology is inevitable or not. It is simply up to the individual they do not need the newest technology, its their choice whether they get it or not. “Awareness of particular tools or machines does not automatically force a society to adopt them or to keep them.” (Page 20)

“People become enmeshed in a web of technical choices made for them by their ancestors. This is not determinism, though it does suggest why people may feel trapped by choices others have made.” (Page 21) I feel like many times he answered his own question by stating that it is very common for people to follow along with society and keep themselves up to date with the newest technology. However, it isn’t the only option, if you really think about it you don’t need the new flat screen televisions or you didn’t need to upgrade your cell phone to the new iphone.

“Rather than assuming that technologies are deterministic, it appears more reasonable to assume that cultural choices shape their uses.” (Page 21) I feel like this quote sums up my response to David Nye’s question. I don’t feel that technology is necessary deterministic. I agree that we can not control what is being invented but we can control if we use the product or not. Its our culture though that determines which devices of technology we use. It matters where you live, who you live with, or how much money you have or even how much you want to show off your money.